Artists

Different time, in different countries, the people had a warm, anger and delicate debate contentious issue is whether the arts and artists should be free to their own lives, or should always be noted their social responsibility and without prejudice to the social services. For me, this little dilemma at, but I would avoid the controversy caused by this series again. One of the most impressive speech on this issue is actually Albert. Camus's Nobel Prize speech, I am happy to agree with his conclusions. Indeed, Russian literature during the decades show a tendency, it is unlikely to indulge in the contemplation of their own, and not too frivolous restless. I'm not ashamed to do everything we can to make this tradition and then continue. Russian literature is no stranger to the concept that over a long period of time, that a writer can do many things within his society, and it is his responsibility to do so.

We inviolability artists just the performance of his own experience and introspection not take into account all rights in the outside world. We can not ask the artist to allow the violation of his rights, but - blame him, begging him, urging him to temptation, he allows us to infringe his rights. After all, he can just sort himself developed, the majority is born like a finished fried into his body, and the talent of this in order to turn the responsibility imposed on his free will. We can assume that the artist did not benefit from any person; however, see the following condition is painful when he retreat into his self-manufactured world or his subjective caprice space, he is likely to submissively handed greedy people in the hands of the real world, if not handed despicable people, not handed the hands of crazy people.

The twentieth century has proved even more brutal than the previous several centuries, but the first five years of this century did not erase all of its horror. Our world is greed, jealousy, lack of control, mutual hostility as old as the caveman era emotions torn apart, and these emotions the way picked up, such as class struggle, racial conflict, the struggle of the masses, the union dispute Class decent pseudonym. Kind of primitive times refused to accept a compromise has been turned into a theoretical principle, and is considered to be orthodox virtues. It needs hundreds of people in the endless civil war to make sacrifices, it is advocating towards our souls, like unchanging, universal goodness and justice concept of these things do not exist, and concepts such fluctuating The fickle. Thus, this rule also came into being - always the most beneficial thing to do for your party. Any professional organizations saw a partially broken convenient opportunity, even if this opportunity is something for nothing; Even if this opportunity is redundant, it will immediately put it to break, regardless of the whole society will collapse down. From an external point of view, the great social unrest in the West is to such an extent, then step beyond this system is necessary not so stable, would collapse.

Violence increasingly plagued by several centuries of law-abiding behavior strong plus restrictions, but is the audacity to stride triumphantly across the whole world can show and prove that it also produces does not come out of it many times history not interested. In addition, the widespread win not just the naked violence, but also violence triumphantly excuse. The world is that brazen belief submerged, that belief is: the powers of omnipotent justice nothing. Fyodor Dostoevsky described by the devil - apparently they were impossible dream to dream of the last century a local qualitative imagine was - climb over the entire world, is our very eyes harassing countries, and through the recent hijacking, kidnapping, bombings and arson to declare them to be shocked and determination to destroy civilization! And they may be completely successful. Young people no other experience in addition to the sexual experience, have not yet gone through years of personal suffering and personal understanding in such a growth era, they are happily repeated fall of nineteenth century Russian error, and they mistakenly think they found something new. Their superficial to the lack of real understanding of ancient human, with no experience in the heart of the naive confidence shouting: Let's get rid of those cruel, greedy oppressors, namely the government, the new government (us!) after the grenade and rifle aside, it will be fair and reasonable. Far from it! ...... Older and sensible man, who could oppose these young people - but many people did not dare oppose them, they even beat Ma Fengcheng, as long as it does not appear to be "conservative" on the line. This is another 19th century Russian phenomenon, Fyodor Dostoyevsky called it on the progress of quirky aphorisms servility.